Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds10 April 20263375607

Redlands Farm Lyne Lane, Virginia Water, GU25 4ES

Planning appeal 3375607 at Redlands Farm Lyne Lane, Virginia Water, GU25 4ES (Runnymede Borough Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 10 April 2026 by Inspector Walker A, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process.

Appeal A: enforcement notice alleging erection of a building used for storage purposes and construction of facilitating hardstanding; Appeal B: refusal of planning permission for an agricultural storage building

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Walker A
Postcode
GU25 4ES

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process.

What decided it

In Appeal B, the Council's refusal reasons directly contradicted NPPF paragraph 154(a) (which states agricultural buildings are not inappropriate in the Green Belt) and relied on policies it later accepted were not strictly relevant, making the refusal unreasonable.

What the Inspector cited

National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

64 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. decided12 October 20266007528
    Land Known to the West of 203-221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
  2. Dismissed12 October 20266006766
    Land to the West of, 203 - 221 New Haw Road, Addlestone, KT15 2DP
  3. Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263377703
    Land Adjacent to Warren Farm, Green Road, Thorpe, Surrey, TW20 8QT
  4. Notice upheld11 February 20263344981
    Loch Fyne, 28 Laleham Reach, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 8RR
  5. Notice upheld10 October 20253356437
    5 Chertsey Lane, Staines-Upon-Thames, Surrey, TW18 3JH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.