Planning appeal decision
Quashed On Legal Grounds10 April 20263375607
Redlands Farm Lyne Lane, VIRGINIA WATER, GU25 4ES
- Authority
- Runnymede Borough Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- agricultural · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Walker A
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) advises that costs may be awarded against a party who has behaved unreasonably and thereby caused the party applying for costs to incur unnecessary or wasted expense in the appeal process.
What decided it
In Appeal B, the Council's refusal reasons directly contradicted NPPF paragraph 154(a) (which states agricultural buildings are not inappropriate in the Green Belt) and relied on policies it later accepted were not strictly relevant, making the refusal unreasonable.
Framework references: 154
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®