Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed21 January 20263375789

The Paddock, Higher Rads End, Eversholt, MK17 9ED

Planning appeal 3375789 at The Paddock, Higher Rads End, Eversholt, MK17 9ED (Central Bedfordshire) was allowed on 21 January 2026 by Inspector Allen K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to local and national policy.

the change of use of land to builders yard to create a parking area of grasscrete surfacing, and associated landscaping to screen retained boundary fence

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Allen K
Postcode
MK17 9ED

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to local and national policy
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The proposal complies with NPPF paragraph 155 as it provides necessary parking for an existing business in a sustainable location on grey belt land that does not undermine Green Belt purposes, and does not harm character and appearance.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy SP7Policy HQ1Policy EMP4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Central Bedfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed15 October 20266009682
    Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
  2. Dismissed15 September 20266007334
    Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
  3. Allowed9 September 20266010929
    2 Palma Close, Dunstable, LU6 1BU
  4. Dismissed8 September 20266009181
    Bracken Ley, London Road, Houghton Conquest, MK45 3LP
  5. Allowed4 September 20266007202
    2 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.