Planning appeal decision
58 Melville Place, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS6 2LZ
Planning appeal 3376009 at 58 Melville Place, Woodhouse, Leeds, LS6 2LZ (Leeds City Council) was allowed on 22 July 2026 by Inspector Whitfield J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the LPA's decision to refuse the LDC application was well-founded.
described as “t he house has been used as an HMO continuously since 2005
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Whitfield J
- Postcode
- LS6 2LZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the LPA's decision to refuse the LDC application was well-founded
What decided it
The appellant demonstrated through a series of consecutive Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreements, statutory declarations, bank statements, and Council Tax records that the property was occupied as a small HMO for ten continuous years from 10 February 2012, thereby accruing immunity from enforcement action.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Leeds City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed12 October 20266011503Craven Bank, Harewood Road, Leeds, LS17 9HL
- Quashed On Legal Grounds6 August 202633768905A Fire Station Houses , Gipton Approach, Leeds, LS9 6NL
- Dismissed24 July 2026337466814 Hessle Avenue, Hyde Park, Leeds, LS6 1EF
- Allowed20 July 20263377309Woodside Trading Estate, Low Lane, Horsforth, Leeds, LS18 5NY
- Notice varied and upheld13 July 2026336856638 Wood Lane, Headingley, Leeds, LS6 2BA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®