Planning appeal decision
Flats 1 -8, 21 Heath Rd, Weybridge, KT13 8TF
Planning appeal 3376496 at Flats 1 -8, 21 Heath Rd, Weybridge, KT13 8TF (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 24 March 2026 by Inspector Jolly J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
for the demolition of existing block of flats and replacement with larger 34-unit residential building
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Jolly J
- Postcode
- KT13 8TF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on nearby trees
- the provision of affordable housing
- whether the development would secure Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG)
- the effect of the proposal on the Thames Basin Special Protection Area (SPA)
What decided it
The failure to provide mandatory Biodiversity Net Gain information as a statutory requirement, combined with the unresolved affordable housing provision and the harm to character and appearance, meant the benefits of the scheme did not outweigh the identified harms even under the tilted balance.
The economic, environmental and social benefits of the residential scheme, including housing delivery and a net gain of up to 26 dwellings, did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the harm to character and appearance, the failure to secure affordable housing, and the failure to meet the statutory BNG requirement.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan (Development Management Plan) (2015)Policy CS14 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM6 of the Elmbridge Local Plan (2015)Policy CS21 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM21 of the Elmbridge Local Plan (2015)Policy CS15 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 73
- Judgments
- Crystal Property (London) Ltd v Secretary of State & LB Hackney EWCA Civ 1265 (2016)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed28 October 2026601339623 Avondale Avenue, Esher, KT10 0DB
- Dismissed21 October 2026601332769 Alexandra Road, Thames Ditton, KT7 0QS
- Dismissed16 October 20266008605Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Dismissed16 October 20266008598Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
- Allowed14 October 20266009254Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, KT10 9AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®