Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 March 20263376649

120 Leman Street, London, E1 8EU

recladding refurbishment and extension of the building to include an additional three floors of accommodation in connection with a change of use from office (Class E) to hotel (Class C1) use, and introduction of associated new plant and equipment, and relat ed works

Authority
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Sabu R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would accord with the development plan strategy for the loss of office space
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and on the setting of nearby Grade II listed buildings

What decided it

The significant weight attributed to the less than substantial heritage harm to the setting of the two Grade II listed buildings was not outweighed by the moderate weight given to the proposal's public benefits.

The significant weight attached to heritage harm and the conflict with the development plan's office-loss strategy were not outweighed by the moderate weight given to the scheme's economic, design and environmental benefits, so the appeal was dismissed.

Framework references: 212, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy S.EMP1, Policy D.EMP3, Policy D.EMP4, Policy S.DH1, Policy S.DH3, London Plan Policy D3, London Plan Policy SD4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.