Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 January 20266000263

Land Adjoining 22 Clovelly Gardens, Romford, Essex, RM7 8NP

Planning appeal 6000263 at Land Adjoining 22 Clovelly Gardens, Romford, Essex, RM7 8NP (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 6 January 2026 by Inspector Sibley G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

erection of a single storey flat roof 2-bedroom bungalow with associated changes to soft and hard landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Sibley G
Postcode
RM7 8NP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the incongruous single-storey flat-roofed form disrupting the uniform pattern of two-storey development significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision.

The moderate benefits of housing delivery and limited benefits of self-build and economic benefits were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, resulting in dismissal despite the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 7Policy 10Policy 26Policy 23Policy 24London Plan Policy T4London Plan Policy T6.1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

238 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed30 April 20266000610
    10 Parkland Avenue, Upminster, Upminster, RM14 2HA
  2. Dismissed6 January 20266001031
    Land Adjacent to 31 Shelley Avenue, Hornchurch, Essex, RM12 4BT
  3. Dismissed22 December 20256000820
    Land Adjacent to No 2 Strathmore Gardens, Strathmore Gardens, Hornchurch, RM12 4BS
  4. Dismissed17 December 20256000176
    1 Charlbury Crescent, Romford, Havering, RM3 8YR
  5. Invalid7 May 20253359602
    12 Ingrebourne Road, Rainham , RM13 9AL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.