Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 September 20256000272

62 Station Road, Upminster, RM14 2TD

Planning appeal 6000272 at 62 Station Road, Upminster, RM14 2TD (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 22 September 2025 by Inspector Wright A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to amenity space, light, outlook, privacy, disturbance and access.

the change of use of office space (use class E) to a one -bedroom maisonette

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Wright A
Postcode
RM14 2TD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to amenity space, light, outlook, privacy, disturbance and access

What decided it

The unacceptable outlook, poor quality amenity space and potential for undue disturbance to future occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweigh the modest housing supply benefit.

The modest housing benefit of one dwelling in an urban location with good access to services and public transport was outweighed by the unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers, particularly the enclosed outlook, poor quality external amenity space and disturbance from adjacent commercial uses.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 9 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 10 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2021Policy 34 of the Havering Local Plan 2021
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

238 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Dismissed27 May 20266003548
    37 Wigton Road, Romford, Essex, RM3 9HB
  2. Notice varied and upheld22 May 20263351504
    159-161 Billet Lane, Hornchurch , RM11 1UR
  3. Dismissed21 May 20266003382
    Rear of 73 Front Lane, Upminster, RM14 1XL
  4. Dismissed18 May 20266002795
    41, Cross Road, Mawneys, Romford, RM7 8AU
  5. Allowed15 May 20266005087
    Land to the Rear of 55-67 Petersfield Avenue, Harold Hill, Romford, Havering, RM3 9PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.