Planning appeal decision
Garage Area Opposite Entrance to 27 Eastfield Road, Leamington Spa, CV32 4EX
Planning appeal 6000664 at Garage Area Opposite Entrance to 27 Eastfield Road, Leamington Spa, CV32 4EX (Warwick District Council) was dismissed on 11 December 2025 by Inspector Guest H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, and whether it would preserve and enhance the character and appearance of the Royal Leamington Spa Conservation Area.
demolition of an existing single storey timber and brick storage garage, and the erection of a two-storey chalet bungalow consisting of two apartments
- Authority
- Warwick District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Guest H
- Postcode
- CV32 4EX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, and whether it would preserve and enhance the character and appearance of the Royal Leamington Spa Conservation Area
- whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupants, with particular regard to outlook
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety, and the living conditions of existing residents, with particular regard to the demand for parking
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Royal Leamington Spa Conservation Area, combined with harm to living conditions and highway safety, was not outweighed by the modest public benefits of the proposal, and the heritage harm provided a strong reason for refusal that displaced the presumption in favour of sustainable development.
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Royal Leamington Spa Conservation Area and the limited harm to highway safety and living conditions of both future occupants and existing residents were not outweighed by the modest benefits of housing provision and modest social, economic and environmental benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HE2Policy HE1Policy BE3Policy TR3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Warwick
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed21 July 20266007706Valley House, Valley Lane, Lapworth, B94 6HB
- Allowed13 July 20266003642The Three Horseshoes, Spring Hill, Bubbenhall, CV8 3BD
- Allowed15 May 20266004949Kenilworth Road, Old Milverton, Warwick, Warwickshire, CV32 6QS
- Allowed19 February 20266000994Land at Church Lane, Whitnash, CV31 2HH
- Allowed10 November 2025336788429 Westlea Road, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV31 3JJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®