Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 March 20266001211

17a Shelley Road, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S65 2NF

Planning appeal 6001211 at 17a Shelley Road, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S65 2NF (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 27 March 2026 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with specific regard to privacy and on the effect of the development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the appeal building, with specific regard to outlook and light.

9No. apartments on three levels with storage rooms in the roof space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J
Postcode
S65 2NF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with specific regard to privacy and on the effect of the development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of the appeal building, with specific regard to outlook and light
  • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The development would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers regarding privacy, and any mitigation through full obscure glazing would in turn cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of future occupiers regarding outlook.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS28 of the Rotherham Core Strategy 2014Policy SP55 of the Rotherham Sites and Policies Plan 2018Policy SP11 of the Rotherham Sites and Policies Plan 2018

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

49 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rotherham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011173
    Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266012644
    56 Knollbeck Lane, Brampton Bierlow, Rotherham, S73 0TP
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266013576
    Windsor,, Eastwood Vale, East Dene,, Rotherham,, S65 2DX
  4. Allowed13 October 20266008695
    Land at Harley Road, Harley, Rotherham, S62 7UD
  5. Dismissed7 September 20266011039
    23A Rowms Lane, Swinton, S64 8AA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.