Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 March 20266001227

8A Neville Gardens, Dagenham, RM8 3QT

Planning appeal 6001227 at 8A Neville Gardens, Dagenham, RM8 3QT (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 12 March 2026 by Inspector Lo S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

the construction of 1 x 1 bed 2-person 2-storey dwelling with associated external amenity area, bicycle storage and waste storage at land adjacent to 8a Neville gardens Dagenham RM8 3QT

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lo S
Postcode
RM8 3QT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • the effect of the proposed development on car parking within the surrounding streets

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area caused by the cumulative intensification and departure from the established pattern of development outweighed the modest housing benefits.

The modest boost to local housing supply and the sustainable location were afforded moderate weight in favour, but this was substantially outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance and the failure to secure well-designed development, resulting in adverse impacts that significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP2 of the BDLPPolicy SPP6 of the BDLPPolicy DMD 1 of the BDLPPolicy DMD 4 of the BDLPPolicy DMT 2 of the BDLPPolicy SP8 of the BDLPPolicy H2 of the LPPolicy SD6 of the LPPolicy D1 of the LPPolicy D4 of the LPPolicy HC1 of the LPPolicy T6 of the LPPolicy T6.1 of the LP
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

478 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  2. Notice upheld17 March 20263332937
    56 Kings Avenue, Romford, RM6 6BB
  3. Notice upheld16 March 20263332931
    532 Becontree Avenue, Dagenham, RM8 3HR
  4. Dismissed27 February 20266001528
    65, Upney Lane, Barking, IG11 9LD
  5. Dismissed17 February 20266001379
    25 Alleyndale Road, Dagenham, RM8 2JQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.