Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 February 20266001528

65, Upney Lane, Barking, IG11 9LD

Planning appeal 6001528 at 65, Upney Lane, Barking, IG11 9LD (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 27 February 2026 by Inspector Burch S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed change of use would be acceptable, with regard to its effect on the supply of family housing and its accessibility to public transport.

change of use of the dwelling (C3) to a 5no. bed, 5no. person HMO (C4), conversion of the garage including the construction of a single storey front extension, and installation of one window to the ground floor side elevation

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Burch S
Postcode
IG11 9LD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed change of use would be acceptable, with regard to its effect on the supply of family housing and its accessibility to public transport
  • the effect of the proposed front extension on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with regard to parking provision

What decided it

The proposed change of use would result in a reduction to the supply of family dwellings for which there is identified need, contrary to Policies SP3 and DMH 5 of the development plan, and no other considerations outweighed this conflict.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP3Policy DMH 5Policy SP8Policy DMT 1Policy DMD 1Policy DMD 5Policy SP2Policy DMT 2Policy T4Policy T1Policy T6Policy T6.1Policy D14Policy D4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

490 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed10 April 20266003483
    12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT
  2. Notice upheld17 March 20263332937
    56 Kings Avenue, Romford, RM6 6BB
  3. Notice upheld16 March 20263332931
    532 Becontree Avenue, Dagenham, RM8 3HR
  4. Dismissed12 March 20266001227
    8A Neville Gardens, Dagenham, RM8 3QT
  5. Dismissed17 February 20266001379
    25 Alleyndale Road, Dagenham, RM8 2JQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.