Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 April 20266003483

12 Neville Gardens, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 3QT

Construction of a new 2x bed 3 person two-storey dwelling with associated external amenity area, parking, cycle storage, and refuse storage at land adjacent to 12 Neville Gardens RM8 3QT

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Phillips A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including the non-designated heritage asset of the Becontree Estate
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of 11 Neville Gardens with particular reference to privacy and outlook
  • Whether the proposal provides safe and sufficient parking

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area, including the non-designated heritage asset, combined with the failure to demonstrate safe and sufficient parking provision, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing and economic benefits.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and insufficient parking provision significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of a single dwelling contribution to housing supply and limited economic benefits, despite the engagement of paragraph 11(d) of the Framework due to lack of five-year housing land supply.

Framework references: 11, 12, 78, 216

Plan policies cited: Policy HC1, Policy SPP6, Policy SP2, Policy DMD1, Policy DMD4, Policy D6, Policy DMT2, Policy T1, Policy T6.1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.