Planning appeal decision
Land at Royal Oak, Thetford Road, Ixworth Thorpe, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP311QW
Planning appeal 6001265 at Land at Royal Oak, Thetford Road, Ixworth Thorpe, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP311QW (West Suffolk) was dismissed on 30 January 2026 by Inspector Whitfield H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, land use and the amount of development proposed, with particular regard to relevant development plan policies for development in the countryside and the site's accessibility to services and facilities.
permission in principle for a detached self-build or custom build dwelling
- Authority
- West Suffolk
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Whitfield H
- Postcode
- IP31 1QW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the site is suitable for residential development, having regard to its location, land use and the amount of development proposed, with particular regard to relevant development plan policies for development in the countryside and the site's accessibility to services and facilities
What decided it
The site's poor connectivity by sustainable travel modes and failure to meet the locational and accessibility criteria of Policy SP21 for countryside dwellings, combined with the limited contribution of a single dwelling to the self-build housing shortfall, means the proposal conflicts with the development plan and material considerations do not indicate a decision should be made otherwise.
The benefits of housing delivery, self-build housing provision, and effective use of previously developed land were outweighed by the conflict with development plan policies on countryside development and sustainable accessibility, with the scale of the development (one dwelling) limiting the weight of the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP21Policy SP12Policy SP13Policy SP20Policy IXW1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 84Paragraph 70Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Braintree DC v SSCLG, Greyread Ltd & Granville Developments Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 610
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Suffolk
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed17 June 20266005559Land Opposite 'Mandarin' and Adj to South View, Wilde St, Beck Row, Mildenhall, IP28 8BL
- Allowed15 June 20266005556Land Between 'Larks Place', And 'Dayspring' Wilde St, Beck Row, Mildenhall, IP28 8BP
- Dismissed14 May 20266003142Land South Of, Grove Lane, Stanton, Suffolk, IP31 2AR
- Dismissed25 March 20263369451Land At Pipers Hall Farm, Whepstead Road, Hawstead, Hawstead, Suffolk, IP29 4TG
- Dismissed19 March 20266001666Land off Manor Lane, Horringer, Suffolk, IP29 5PY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®