Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 May 20266001540

Land to North of St Marys Road, Manton, Rutland, LE15 8SU

Planning appeal 6001540 at Land to North of St Marys Road, Manton, Rutland, LE15 8SU (Rutland County Council) was dismissed on 13 May 2026 by Inspector Cross D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

outline planning application with all matters reserved apart from access for the phased development of up to 2 serviced plots for Self-Build and Custom Housebuilding

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cross D
Postcode
LE15 8SU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal would be an effective use of land, with due regard to affordable housing
  • Other considerations relevant to the planning balance

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the design and siting of the proposed vehicular access projecting into the countryside outweighed the moderate benefits of the scheme.

The adverse impacts, principally significant harm to character and appearance, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits (self-build provision, housing land supply contribution, economic and environmental benefits), which carried no more than moderate weight, so the tilted balance did not favour granting permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS19Policy CS10Policy SP15Policy SP23Policy SP9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 73

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

11 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Rutland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed12 October 20266009205
    Land Rear of 25-27 Stapleford Road, Whissendine, LE15 7HF
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266010934
    Land off Pickworh Road, Great Casterton, PE9 4AU
  3. Allowed20 March 20263373786
    Land off Braunston Road, Oakham, LE15 6LY
  4. Allowed3 February 20263370334
    Land to the East of Normanton Road, Edith Weston, LE15 8HD
  5. Allowed13 August 20253323746
    Land at Brooke Road, Braunston-in-Rutland, Oakham, LE15 8QR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.