Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 February 20266001577

354 High Street, Berkhamsted, Herts, HP4 1HU

Planning appeal 6001577 at 354 High Street, Berkhamsted, Herts, HP4 1HU (Dacorum Borough Council) was allowed on 5 February 2026 by Inspector Walker C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on the integrity of the SAC.

proposed three x two bedroom dwellings to the rear of 354 High Street and associated car parking and landscaping

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Walker C
Postcode
HP4 1HU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the integrity of the SAC
  • the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to density and layout, on living conditions of future occupiers with regard to the garden areas and on highway safety with regard to parking

What decided it

The inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply engaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development, and the benefits of providing three homes on brownfield land in a sustainable location outweighed the limited harms identified.

The benefits of providing three homes on previously developed land in a sustainable location, with economic and social benefits, outweighed the limited harms comprising conflict with Appendix 3 regarding external rear access and very limited less-than-substantial harm to the setting of the conservation area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS26CS11CS12CS8Appendix 3 of the Local Plan 1991-2011 (2004)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

88 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dacorum

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266003892
    Bulbourne Wood, New Road, Northchurch, Berkhamsted, HP4 1LN
  2. Allowed14 October 20266006896
    Apsley Depot, Ebberns Road, Apsley, HP3 9RE
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266011489
    Plot HD587047 of Lot B2A, Upper Bourne End Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 2RR
  4. Dismissed13 July 20266005722
    87 Chambersbury Lane, Hemel Hempstead, HP3 8BD
  5. Dismissed22 April 20266003939
    63 Dunlin Road, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, HP2 6LY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.