Planning appeal decision
31 Syke Lane, Lightcliffe, Brighouse, HX3 8SY
Planning appeal 6001727 at 31 Syke Lane, Lightcliffe, Brighouse, HX3 8SY (Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 16 February 2026 by Inspector Spataru A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan policy, including the effect on openness.
change of use of land to garden (retrospective), installation of post and rail fence, engineering and regrading works and retention of building for the storage of equipment for the maintenance of the land
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Spataru A
- Postcode
- HX3 8SY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and the development plan policy, including the effect on openness
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the Thornton/Queensbury Landscape Character Area
- If the development would be inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by way of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness and conflict with the purposes of Green Belt designation, and this harm is not clearly outweighed by other considerations to establish very special circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy HS1Policy BT1Policy BT2Policy GN4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Calderdale
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed22 October 20266012724Mona Cottage, 1 Dewsbury Road, Elland, HX5 9JU
- Allowed12 October 2026600957629 Syke Lane, Lightcliffe, Brighouse, HX3 8SY
- Dismissed9 October 20266008120Ashdene, Syke Lane, Ogden, Halifax, HX2 9NU
- Dismissed3 September 20266008062Land North of Helm Farm Cottages, Helm Lane, Triangle, Sowerby Bridge, HX6 3DU
- Allowed1 September 20266010078Windmill Court County House, Keighley Road, Illingworth,, Halifax, HX2 8YB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®