Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 March 20266002105

53, Land adjacent to No. 53 Rydens Grove, Hersham, Surrey, KT12 5RU

a detached house

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lawrence R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, including 53 Rydens Grove and 121, 123 and 125 Molesey Road, with particular regard to outlook, sunlight and daylight
  • whether the proposal would provide a suitable standard of accommodation for future occupants, with particular regard to the internal space and private amenity space
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed parking arrangements on highway safety and on-street parking stress

What decided it

The significant and harmful impact on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, combined with the failure to demonstrate compliance with internal space standards and the pedestrian obstruction caused by the parking arrangement, substantially and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of delivering a single dwelling.

The significant harm to neighbouring living conditions, accommodation standards and pedestrian safety substantially and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of delivering a single dwelling and making effective use of land in a sustainable location, such that the scheme would not represent sustainable development.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DM2, Policy DM7, Policy DM10, Policy CS5, Policy CS17, Elmbridge Design Code 2024

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.