Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 April 20266002326

2 Malthouse Lane, Earlswood, Solihull, B94 5RY

erection of two storey side and rear extension, single storey rear extension and alterations to the front

Authority
Stratford-on-Avon District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hole K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The 80% increase in volume constitutes disproportionate additions to the original building, making the development inappropriate in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it.

Framework references: 154, 142, 155

Plan policies cited: CS.10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.