Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 April 20266002464

26 Eliot Road, Dagenham, RM9 5XT

single storey front, side and rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Fern L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed side and front extensions on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area, having regard to the Becontree Estate as a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The proposed front and side extensions would harm the character and appearance of the host property and the Becontree Estate non-designated heritage asset, contrary to the development plan policies requiring preservation of its historic fabric and integration with existing character.

Framework references: 216

Plan policies cited: Policy D4, Policy HC1, Policy SP2, Policy SPP6, Policy DMD1, Policy DMD4, Policy DMD5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.