Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent 9 Woodall Lane, Harthill, Rotherham, S26 7YQ
Planning appeal 6002593 at Land Adjacent 9 Woodall Lane, Harthill, Rotherham, S26 7YQ (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 23 March 2026 by Inspector Heron E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether varying the condition would result in development acceptable in planning terms, with regard to its effect on the character and appearance of the area, including Harthill Conservation Area.
Erection of detached dwelling with first floor rear balconies and attached garage without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref RB2023/1512, dated 20 February 2024
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Heron E
- Postcode
- S26 7YQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether varying the condition would result in development acceptable in planning terms, with regard to its effect on the character and appearance of the area, including Harthill Conservation Area
- Whether varying the condition would result in development acceptable in planning terms, with regard to its effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to privacy
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of Harthill Conservation Area caused by the cumulative effect of the alterations to the dwelling's form, scale, massing and fenestration outweighs any public benefits and conflicts with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS23CS28SP41SP55SP12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 131Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rotherham
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed27 October 20266011173Green Acres, Moat Lane, Wickersley, S66 1DZ
- Dismissed22 October 2026601264456 Knollbeck Lane, Brampton Bierlow, Rotherham, S73 0TP
- Dismissed15 October 20266013576Windsor,, Eastwood Vale, East Dene,, Rotherham,, S65 2DX
- Allowed13 October 20266008695Land at Harley Road, Harley, Rotherham, S62 7UD
- Dismissed7 September 2026601103923A Rowms Lane, Swinton, S64 8AA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®