Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 April 20266002690

90 Woodfield Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0DS

Planning appeal 6002690 at 90 Woodfield Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0DS (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 April 2026 by Inspector Marriott H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

a ‘new dwelling in garden of 90 Woodfield Road. 2 storey with 3 bedrooms and additional rooms in roof space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Marriott H
Postcode
KT7 0DS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of living and outdoor amenity space
  • the effect if the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 90, with particular regard to outlook and light
  • whether or not the mandatory biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements would be met
  • whether or not the site would be at risk of flooding, having regard to the flood risk mitigation proposed
  • the effect of the proposed development on the provision of parking, with particular regard to highway safety

What decided it

The substantial and cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, unresolved flood risk, and unmet biodiversity net gain requirements significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits of a single dwelling, particularly given the site's constrained and visually sensitive location.

The adverse impacts of the proposed development, comprising substantial harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, unresolved flood risk and unmet BNG requirements, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery and socio-economic benefits from one additional dwelling, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015)Policy DM10 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015)Policy CS26 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy CS25 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 170Paragraph 175

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

237 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed6 October 20266010653
    Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
  2. Allowed3 September 20266007869
    Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
  3. Allowed10 August 20266006033
    31 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD
  4. Allowed9 July 20266005552
    1a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
  5. Dismissed28 May 20266005939
    Nicholson House, 41 Thames Street, Weybridge, KT13 8JG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.