Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 April 20266002690

90 Woodfield Road, thames ditton, Surrey, KT7 0DS

a ‘new dwelling in garden of 90 Woodfield Road. 2 storey with 3 bedrooms and additional rooms in roof space

Authority
Elmbridge Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Marriott H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether or not the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of living and outdoor amenity space
  • the effect if the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 90, with particular regard to outlook and light
  • whether or not the mandatory biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements would be met
  • whether or not the site would be at risk of flooding, having regard to the flood risk mitigation proposed
  • the effect of the proposed development on the provision of parking, with particular regard to highway safety

What decided it

The substantial and cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, unresolved flood risk, and unmet biodiversity net gain requirements significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits of a single dwelling, particularly given the site's constrained and visually sensitive location.

The adverse impacts of the proposed development, comprising substantial harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, unresolved flood risk and unmet BNG requirements, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery and socio-economic benefits from one additional dwelling, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 170, 175

Plan policies cited: Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011), Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015), Policy DM10 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015), Policy CS26 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011), Policy CS25 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011), Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.