Planning appeal decision
90 Woodfield Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0DS
Planning appeal 6002690 at 90 Woodfield Road, Thames Ditton, Surrey, KT7 0DS (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 April 2026 by Inspector Marriott H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
a ‘new dwelling in garden of 90 Woodfield Road. 2 storey with 3 bedrooms and additional rooms in roof space
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Marriott H
- Postcode
- KT7 0DS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether or not the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to the provision of living and outdoor amenity space
- the effect if the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of No 90, with particular regard to outlook and light
- whether or not the mandatory biodiversity net gain (BNG) requirements would be met
- whether or not the site would be at risk of flooding, having regard to the flood risk mitigation proposed
- the effect of the proposed development on the provision of parking, with particular regard to highway safety
What decided it
The substantial and cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, unresolved flood risk, and unmet biodiversity net gain requirements significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits of a single dwelling, particularly given the site's constrained and visually sensitive location.
The adverse impacts of the proposed development, comprising substantial harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future and neighbouring occupiers, unresolved flood risk and unmet BNG requirements, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery and socio-economic benefits from one additional dwelling, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015)Policy DM10 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015)Policy CS26 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy CS25 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy (2011)Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Local Plan Development Management Plan (2015)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 170Paragraph 175
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed6 October 20266010653Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
- Allowed3 September 20266007869Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
- Allowed10 August 2026600603331 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD
- Allowed9 July 202660055521a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
- Dismissed28 May 20266005939Nicholson House, 41 Thames Street, Weybridge, KT13 8JG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®