Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision20 March 20266003069

Ludham Road, Catfield, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR29 5PY

Planning appeal 6003069 at Ludham Road, Catfield, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, NR29 5PY (North Norfolk District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 20 March 2026 by Inspector Whitfield H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the submitted details would provide an adequate means for surface water disposal which is consistent with the terms and would satisfy the requirements of Condition 5.

Part change of use of existing agricultural machinery workshop/store and haulage depot to incorporate a containerised self-storage facility (B8 storage) (retrospective)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Other minor developments
Inspector
Whitfield H
Postcode
NR29 5PY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the submitted details would provide an adequate means for surface water disposal which is consistent with the terms and would satisfy the requirements of Condition 5
  • Whether the submitted details would provide a suitable Secure Access Scheme which is consistent with the terms and would satisfy the requirements of Condition 14

What decided it

Option 1 of the French drain proposal complied with the specific terms of Condition 5 and Policy EN 13, whereas the camera-only Secure Access Scheme failed to physically manage access to the site and lacked the required management plan and maintenance schedule specified in Condition 14.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN 13 of the North Norfolk Local Development Framework Core Strategy (2008)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

5 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in North Norfolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed22 September 20266008881
    The Old Post House, Mundesley Road, Trimingham, NR11 8DZ
  2. Dismissed15 September 20266006812
    Green House, Cromer Road, Thorpe Market, NR11 8TH
  3. Dismissed24 August 20266008744
    Land Rear of 1 Nelson Road, North Walsham, NR28 9HL
  4. Dismissed16 March 20266001938
    Police Station (Former), Norwich Road, Holt, NR25 6SH
  5. Allowed11 March 20266002109
    8 Langham Road, Blakeney, Norfolk, NR25 7PG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.