Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 April 20266003440

31 Junction Road, ASHFORD, TW15 1NJ

a rear hip to gable extension, with 2 no. flank dormers, and 2 no. rooflights, to facilitate loft conversion into habitable space. Erection of a single storey rear extension. Changes to fenestration and extension of dropped kerb with new hardstanding on front driveway. All to facilitate the conversion of a C3 dwellinghouse into a 7-person HMO (Sui-Generis) with associated parking and amenities

Authority
Spelthorne Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Sylvester G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants with particular regard to outlook from ground floor bedrooms and the amount of outdoor amenity space
  • if harm arises whether it is outweighed by any fallback position

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance and the failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants, particularly regarding outlook and outdoor amenity space, were not outweighed by the limited benefits of the proposal or the fallback positions available.

The adverse impacts on living conditions and character and appearance significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of providing denser, more affordable accommodation, such that the Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 129, 135, 139

Plan policies cited: SLP Policy PS2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.