Planning appeal decision
Traveller's Rest, Rockshaw Road, Caterham, RH1 3DE
Planning appeal 6003752 at Traveller's Rest, Rockshaw Road, Caterham, RH1 3DE (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 4 June 2026 by Inspector N Bowden, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the location of the site within the Surrey Hills National Landscape (SHNL) and Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV).
the change of use of land to a gypsy caravan site comprising of one touring caravan, a caravan and a day room
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy
- Inspector
- N Bowden
- Postcode
- RH1 3DE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the location of the site within the Surrey Hills National Landscape (SHNL) and Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV)
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies, including the effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
What decided it
The proposal satisfied all the tests in paragraph 155 of the Framework (grey belt, demonstrable unmet need, and sustainable location) and caused no harm to the SHNL/AGLV, so it was not inappropriate development in the Green Belt and accorded with the development plan.
As no harm was found to the SHNL/AGLV or the Green Belt and the proposal was found to comply with the development plan, no countervailing harms arose to weigh against the identified benefits, including the unmet need for traveller pitches.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP21Policy DP7Policy DP10Policy CSP9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 189Paragraph 142Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 143Paragraph 56Paragraph 57
- Judgments
- New Forest National Park Authority v SSHCLG [2025] EWHC 726 (Admin); Monkhill Ltd v SSHCLG [2019] EWHC 1993 (Admin); (Morris) v Wealden District Council [2014] EWHC 4081 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®