Planning appeal decision
2 Fairmile Lane, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 2DJ
Planning appeal 6003836 at 2 Fairmile Lane, Cobham, Surrey, KT11 2DJ (Elmbridge Borough Council) was allowed on 14 May 2026 by Inspector Thandi B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area.
a detached two-storey building with rooms in the roof space, dormer windows and rear balconies containing 11 flats and 2 detached two-storey houses with rooms in the roof space, associated garages, bin and cycle stores and parking following the demolition of the existing dwelling and outbuildings
- Authority
- Elmbridge Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Thandi B
- Postcode
- KT11 2DJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
- The effect of the proposed development upon the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths SPA
What decided it
The extant permission on the appeal site for a similar layout with fewer residences represented a material fallback position, and the proposed scheme would not result in an over-development or undermine the area's quality when considered against the varied character of the locality and the mitigation secured for the SPA.
The benefits of an efficient use of land in a well-established residential location in keeping with the character and appearance of the surroundings, with adequate mitigation for the Thames Basin Heaths SPA, outweighed any concerns about density and parking.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS10Policy CS17Policy DM2Policy CS13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 55
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed6 October 20266010653Land Rear Of 12-14 New Road, Esher, KT10 9PG
- Allowed3 September 20266007869Wild Flowers, Wren's Hill, Oxshott, KT22 0HN
- Allowed10 August 2026600603331 Stevens Lane, Claygate, Esher, KT10 0TD
- Allowed9 July 202660055521a Carmalt Gardens, Hersham, KT12 5HQ
- Dismissed28 May 20266005939Nicholson House, 41 Thames Street, Weybridge, KT13 8JG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®