Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed28 May 20266003845

Picadilly, outside no.51, Manchester, M1 2AP

the removal of an existing In Link Unit and the deployment of a replacement Street Hub 3 unit

Authority
Manchester City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Lancaster K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance character or appearance of the Stevenson Square Conservation Area and the setting of nearby listed buildings
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposed advertisement on the visual amenity of the area

What decided it

The proposal comprises a replacement of an existing unit with only modest increases in scale and footprint, positioned in a broadly similar location between mature trees within a wide pavement, which would not result in unacceptable harm to character, appearance, visual amenity or the setting of heritage assets.

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1, Policy CC9, Policy EN1, Policy EN3, Policy DM1, Saved Policy DC18, Saved Policy DC19, Saved Policy DC22, Saved Policy DC15, Policy JP-Strat2, Policy JP-P1, Policy JP-P2, Policy JP-C5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.