Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed29 May 20266003884

Brown Street, Outside H&M, Manchester, M2 1DA

the removal of an existing InLink Unit, and the deployment of a replacement Street Hub 3 unit

Authority
Manchester City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Lancaster K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effect of proposed development on character and appearance of area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Upper King Street Conservation Area
  • Highway safety, with particular regard to pedestrian movement
  • Effect of proposed advertisement on amenity and public safety

What decided it

The marginal increase in size of the replacement unit and its location in a broadly similar position to the existing unit, combined with the busy commercial context with existing street furniture and illumination, meant the proposal would not cause unacceptable harm to character, appearance, heritage significance or pedestrian safety.

Framework references: 117

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1, Policy CC9, Policy EN1, Policy EN3, Policy DM1, Saved Policy DC19, Policy JP-P1, Policy JP-P2, Policy JP-C5, Policy CC5, Policy T1, Saved Policy DC22, Policy JP-C4, Policy DC15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.