Planning appeal decision
Land Between Timbers & Tanglefields, Carlton Road,, Carlton Road,, South Godstone,, RH9 8LF
Planning appeal 6004026 at Land Between Timbers & Tanglefields, Carlton Road,, Carlton Road,, South Godstone,, RH9 8LF (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 2 June 2026 by Inspector E Everitt, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
described on the application form as “erection of a detached sustainable dwelling on the site of a previous dwelling. This includes associated access, parking and curtilage
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- E Everitt
- Postcode
- RH9 8LF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- whether the proposed development would be suitably located having regard to the accessibility of services and facilities
- whether the proposed development makes adequate provision for parking
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The appeal site is not in a sustainable location due to the unsuitability of pedestrian and cycling routes to services and facilities, which means the proposal fails the sustainability criterion in paragraph 155 of the Framework and constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt without very special circumstances.
The moderate benefits of housing delivery and self-build provision do not clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, the harm to openness, the unsuitability of location, and the inadequate parking provision.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP10Policy DP13Policy DP5Policy DP7Policy CSP12Policy CSP9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 117Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®