Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 April 20266004114

53 High Street, Eye, Peterborough, PE6 7UX

installation of roller shutters (retrospective)

Authority
Peterborough City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Other minor developments
Inspector
Gardner L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building, and whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Eye Conservation Area; preserves the setting of the Grade II listed building at 48 High Street and the effect of the development on the significance of the Methodist Chapel, a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The harm to the Conservation Area and listed building setting, assessed as less than substantial but considerable, outweighs the limited public benefits of increased building security, particularly where alternative security measures were not demonstrated to have been considered.

Framework references: 215, 216

Plan policies cited: Policy LP18, Policy LP16, Policy LP19

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.