Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 April 20266004114

53 High Street, Eye, Peterborough, PE6 7UX

Planning appeal 6004114 at 53 High Street, Eye, Peterborough, PE6 7UX (Peterborough City Council) was dismissed on 24 April 2026 by Inspector Gardner L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building, and whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Eye Conservation Area; preserves the setting of the Grade II listed building at 48 High Street and the effect of the development on the significance of the Methodist Chapel, a non-designated heritage asset.

installation of roller shutters (retrospective)

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Other minor developments
Inspector
Gardner L
Postcode
PE6 7UX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building, and whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Eye Conservation Area; preserves the setting of the Grade II listed building at 48 High Street and the effect of the development on the significance of the Methodist Chapel, a non-designated heritage asset

What decided it

The harm to the Conservation Area and listed building setting, assessed as less than substantial but considerable, outweighs the limited public benefits of increased building security, particularly where alternative security measures were not demonstrated to have been considered.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP18Policy LP16Policy LP19
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 215Paragraph 216

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Peterborough

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed14 July 20253361419
    Land to the East of Lincoln Road, Glinton, PE6 7LN
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266011357
    310 Lincoln Road, Peterborough, PE1 2ND
  3. Dismissed15 October 20266008850
    43, Priestgate, Peterborough, PE1 1AR
  4. Dismissed14 October 20266010660
    1 Mayors Walk, Peterborough, PE3 6EU
  5. Allowed6 October 20266009036
    Dobbies Garden Centre, Phorpres Way, Cygnet Park, Peterborough, PE7 8NY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.