Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 June 20266004465

132 Hull Road, Woodmansey, HU17 0TH

the change of use from a barn to a dwelling including alterations to, and installation of new windows, doors and cladding, erection of an outbuilding, and associated landscaping

Authority
East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
HU17 0TH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • flood risk
  • whether the proposed development amounts to an appropriate form of development in respect to its effect on the character and appearance of the area and the host building's immediate setting, including whether it involves significant alteration/extension

What decided it

The absence of a design flood level in the flood risk assessment meant the adequacy of the proposed flood mitigation measures could not be properly assessed, creating unacceptable uncertainty about the safety of future occupiers in a single-storey building in an area at increased flood risk.

Framework references: 170, 176, 181, 84, 135, 187

Plan policies cited: Policy S4 Section D, Policy ENV1 sections A1, B1, B3, Policy A1, Policy ENV6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.