Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 June 20266004707

Fairlight, Mill Cross Rattery, Totnes, TQ10 9LA

Planning appeal 6004707 at Fairlight, Mill Cross Rattery, Totnes, TQ10 9LA (South Hams) was dismissed on 17 June 2026 by Inspector H Nicholls, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal complies with the development plan in relation to access to services and minimising the need to travel by private vehicle.

replacement of a residential studio with a self-build dwelling

Authority
South Hams
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
H Nicholls
Postcode
TQ10 9LA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal complies with the development plan in relation to access to services and minimising the need to travel by private vehicle

What decided it

The proposal would create a household entirely reliant on private vehicles to access services, conflicting with development plan policies directing sustainable development to locations with access to services and minimising travel by private vehicle, and this conflict with the development plan's spatial objectives outweighed the benefits under the tilted balance.

The modest benefits of delivering one dwelling towards the substantial housing shortfall and construction-phase economic benefits were outweighed by the significant adverse impact of creating a car-dependent household at odds with the development plan's sustainable location policies, which still attract considerable weight despite the housing supply shortfall.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SPT1SPT2TTV1TTV26TTV27
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Hams

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed13 October 20266009219
    Land at Chipple Park, Lutton, Ivybridge, PL21 9TA
  2. Dismissed28 April 20266002918
    Westward, Grand View Road, Hope Cove, TQ7 3HE
  3. Allowed24 February 20266001392
    1 The Stables Church Cross to Memory Cross, Landscove, Ashburton, Devon, TQ13 7RR
  4. Dismissed20 February 20263375951
    Land East of - 4 Munro Ave, Yealmpton, Devon, PL8 2NQ
  5. Allowed23 December 20243349444
    Hill Mount, Hillfield, Stoke Gabriel, Devon, TQ9 6SH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.