Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed12 June 20266004715

King Street, Outside no.48, Manchester, M2 6AF

Planning appeal 6004715 at King Street, Outside no.48, Manchester, M2 6AF (Manchester City Council) was allowed on 12 June 2026 by Inspector K Lancaster, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance character or appearance of the St Ann's Square Conservation Area and the setting of nearby listed buildings.

the removal of an existing In Link Unit and the deployment of a replacement Street Hub 3 unit

Appeal type
advert · Commercial advertisement
Procedure
Written
Development
utilities-energy
Inspector
K Lancaster
Postcode
M2 6AF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local area, with particular regard to whether it would preserve or enhance character or appearance of the St Ann's Square Conservation Area and the setting of nearby listed buildings
  • Highway safety, with particular regard to pedestrian movement

What decided it

The marginal increase in size of the replacement unit, combined with its location within an existing busy commercial street context with numerous street furniture and illuminated advertisements, meant it would not cause unacceptable harm to character, appearance, heritage assets or pedestrian safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP1Policy CC9Policy EN1Policy EN3Policy DM1Saved Policy DC19Policy JP-P1Policy JP-P2Policy JP-C5Policy CC5Policy T1Saved Policy DC22Policy JP-C4Policy DC15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 117

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

266 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Manchester City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed6 October 20266009176
    571 Oldham Road, Manchester, M40 5AF
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266005102
    Arndale Centre, Market Street, Manchester, M4 3AB
  3. Allowed7 September 20266010295
    Fountain Street, Outside No. 20, Manchester, M2 3AW
  4. Dismissed26 August 20266008236
    1 Goods Yard Street, Manchester, M3 3BG
  5. Dismissed13 July 20266009630
    Land at 1-11 Oldham Road, South West of Cable Street, Manchester, M4 5EQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.