Planning appeal decision
9 Common Lane, Sundon, LU3 3PF
Planning appeal 6004831 at 9 Common Lane, Sundon, LU3 3PF (Central Bedfordshire Council) was dismissed on 19 June 2026 by Inspector Tom Gilbert-Wooldridge, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to paragraph 155 of the NPPF and any relevant development plan policies.
demolition of existing structures and the erection of 9 residential dwellings with associated access, parking, and landscaping and ancillary works
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- Tom Gilbert-Wooldridge
- Postcode
- LU3 3PF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to paragraph 155 of the NPPF and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety and parking
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal fails to meet NPPF paragraph 155(c) as it would not be in a sustainable location, rendering it inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the harms to openness and character are not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery.
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and significant harm to openness and character was not clearly outweighed by moderate weight afforded to housing delivery and other social, economic and environmental benefits, so very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy HQ8Policy T2Policy T3Policy EE12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 155
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed15 October 20266009682Land West Of Hurricane Avenue, Lower Stondon, SG16 6NW
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed9 September 202660109292 Palma Close, Dunstable, LU6 1BU
- Dismissed8 September 20266009181Bracken Ley, London Road, Houghton Conquest, MK45 3LP
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®