Planning appeal decision
267 Hillbury Road, Warlingham, CR6 9TL
Planning appeal 6005174 at 267 Hillbury Road, Warlingham, CR6 9TL (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 3 June 2026 by Inspector S Simms, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt.
demolition of the existing dwelling on site and development of nine apartments with associated access, parking and landscaping
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- S Simms
- Postcode
- CR6 9TL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies and the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The site qualifies as grey belt land meeting the criteria at NPPF paragraph 155, and the shortage of housing land in the district engages the presumption in favour of sustainable development, with the benefits of eight additional dwellings in a sustainable location outweighing the conflict with outdated local plan policies.
The benefits of eight additional dwellings in a sustainable location and support to the local economy during construction outweigh the modest weight given to conflict with outdated local plan policies DP10 and DP13, with no adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing these benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Tandridge District Core Strategy Policy CSP18Tandridge Local Plan Part 2 Policy DP10Tandridge Local Plan Part 2 Policy DP13Tandridge Local Plan Part 2 Policy DP7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 135Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 232
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®