Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 August 20266005448

Land Rear of 16 Julian Road, Folkestone, CT19 5HP

Planning appeal 6005448 at Land Rear of 16 Julian Road, Folkestone, CT19 5HP (Folkestone and Hythe District Council) was dismissed on 4 August 2026 by Inspector B. Johnson, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

Residential development comprising of 2 x 2 bedroom apartments and 4 x 1 bedroom apartments

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
B. Johnson
Postcode
CT19 5HP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at 16 Julian Road and 5 Radnor Park West, with regard to overlooking and privacy
  • Whether sufficient arboricultural information has been provided to enable a proper assessment of the effect of the proposal on existing trees

What decided it

The adverse impacts on character and appearance, living conditions and trees would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the identified benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.

the adverse impacts on character and appearance, living conditions and trees would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the identified benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HB1Policy HB10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 131Paragraph 135Paragraph 136Paragraph 139Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

126 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Folkestone and Hythe District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed23 October 20266010522
    Atholl Cottage, Bartholomew Street, Hythe, CT21 5BS
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266014928
    130 Dolphins Road, Folkestone, CT19 5QB
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266007677
    Building Opposite Nash Cottage, Ashford Road, Brenzett, TN29 0BL
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266004364
    Opposite 67 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 1RY
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266004363
    Opposite 67 Sandgate Road, Folkestone, CT20 1RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.