Planning appeal decision
Chardwood Rest Home, 127 Eastbourne Road, Pevensey Bay, BN24 6BN
Planning appeal 6005607 at Chardwood Rest Home, 127 Eastbourne Road, Pevensey Bay, BN24 6BN (Wealden District Council) was dismissed on 7 July 2026 by Inspector A Knight, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal scheme comprises the creation of an HMO, or of flats.
change of use of the former care home into a 12 bedroom HMO with associated car and cycle parking and landscaping proposals
- Authority
- Wealden District Council
- Appeal type
- Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- A Knight
- Postcode
- BN24 6BN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal scheme comprises the creation of an HMO, or of flats
What decided it
The private kitchen facilities provided in each unit are sufficiently comprehensive that they constitute self-contained flats rather than HMO bedrooms, causing the scheme to conflict with development plan policies on space standards and affordable housing.
Although the Council cannot demonstrate a five-year housing land supply and the scheme would direct development to a sustainable location and make effective use of land, the adverse impacts of providing undersized flats that fall short of nationally described space standards and fail to provide affordable housing significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, particularly as the appellant could implement the approved HMO scheme or another permission for seven flats to make a comparable contribution to housing without providing undersized accommodation.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Saved Policy EN27 of the Wealden Local Plan (1998)Spatial Planning Objectives SPO3Spatial Planning Objectives SPO13Policy WCS14 of the Wealden Core Strategy Local Plan (2013)Policy AFH1 of the Affordable Housing Delivery Local Plan (2016)
- Judgments
- Gravesham Borough Council v Secretary of State for the Environment (1984); Uttlesford District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (2016); Moore v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (2013); Khodari, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (2017); Brighton & Hove City Council v Secretary of State (2019)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wealden District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed23 October 2026601128637 High Street, Frant, TN3 9DT
- Dismissed23 October 20266010554Ivy House, Mayfield Road, Mark Cross, Rotherfield, TN6 3PJ
- Dismissed6 October 20266011082Willow Farm, Under Road, Herstmonceux, BN27 1QE
- Notice varied and upheld28 September 20263356589Land An New House Farm, Buckham Hill, Isfield, East Sussex, TN22 5XU
- Dismissed25 September 20266009517Fairfield Cottage, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0SN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®