Planning appeal decision
Dippen Hall, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, RH7 6JX
Planning appeal 6005965 at Dippen Hall, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, RH7 6JX (Tandridge District Council) was allowed on 16 June 2026 by Inspector John Pearce, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework.
the erection of 7 dwellings, car parking and associated landscaping to the rear of Dippen Hall
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- John Pearce
- Postcode
- RH7 6JX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of development plan policy and the National Planning Policy Framework
- if it is inappropriate, whether the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The proposal meets the criteria in NPPF paragraph 155 as grey belt development in a sustainable location with demonstrable housing need, making it not inappropriate development in the Green Belt and therefore acceptable.
The significant weight in favour of the proposal due to the delivery of 7 dwellings and associated social and economic benefits outweighs any adverse impacts when assessed against the policies of the Framework taken as a whole, particularly given the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing supply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DP5Policy DP10Policy DP13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 143Paragraph 155Paragraph 156Paragraph 157
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®