Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 May 20266006857

King Street, Opposite No. 1-5, Caffe Nero, Hammersmith, W6 9HR

Planning appeal 6006857 at King Street, Opposite No. 1-5, Caffe Nero, Hammersmith, W6 9HR (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 26 May 2026 by Inspector McDonagh C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposals in both appeals on the character and appearance/amenity of the area with particular regard to designated heritage assets.

The proposed removal of an existing InLink Unit, and the deployment of a replacement Street Hub 3 unit

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
McDonagh C
Postcode
W6 9HR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposals in both appeals on the character and appearance/amenity of the area with particular regard to designated heritage assets
  • The effects of the proposals in Appeal B on pedestrian mobility

What decided it

The increased width of the replacement hub would reduce the available footway width to below the Council's minimum standards for pedestrian mobility, conflicting with development plan policies on pedestrian movement.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DC1DC8DC9DC10T1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 207

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 764 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed3 June 20266006883
    Outside No. 59 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8EG
  2. Dismissed3 June 20266006882
    Outside No. 59 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8EG
  3. Dismissed26 May 20266006850
    King Street, Opposite No. 1-5, Caffe Nero, Hammersmith, W6 9HR
  4. Dismissed13 May 20266006384
    Lillie Road, Outside No.107, London, SW6 7SX
  5. Dismissed22 July 20253357918
    Pavement Outside White City Station, Wood Lane, Shepherds Bush , London, W12 7RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.