Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20266006883

Outside No. 59 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8EG

Planning appeal 6006883 at Outside No. 59 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8EG (London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham) was dismissed on 3 June 2026 by Inspector C McDonagh, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposals on the character and appearance/amenity of the area with particular regard to the Hammersmith Grove Conservation Area.

removal of an existing InLink Unit, and the deployment of a replacement Street Hub 3 unit

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
utilities-energy
Inspector
C McDonagh
Postcode
W12 8EG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposals on the character and appearance/amenity of the area with particular regard to the Hammersmith Grove Conservation Area
  • The effects of the proposal in Appeal B on pedestrian mobility

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the Hammersmith Grove Conservation Area caused by the significantly larger and more prominent replacement unit and display screens outweighs the marginal benefits of upgrading the communications services.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DC1DC8DC9DC10T1T3Hammersmith and Fulham Local PlanLondon Plan T1London Plan T2London Plan D5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 207Paragraph 212Paragraph 215

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 760 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed3 June 20266006882
    Outside No. 59 Goldhawk Road, London, W12 8EG
  2. Dismissed26 May 20266006857
    King Street, Opposite No. 1-5, Caffe Nero, Hammersmith, W6 9HR
  3. Dismissed26 May 20266006850
    King Street, Opposite No. 1-5, Caffe Nero, Hammersmith, W6 9HR
  4. Dismissed13 May 20266006384
    Lillie Road, Outside No.107, London, SW6 7SX
  5. Dismissed22 July 20253357918
    Pavement Outside White City Station, Wood Lane, Shepherds Bush , London, W12 7RH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.