Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 June 20266007012

Agricultural Building At Grid Reference 263359 108381, Winkleigh, EX19 8HZ

Demolition of agricultural barns and the construction of 1 no. dwelling with associated works following the grant of prior approval (refs. 1/0010/2025/AGMB)

Authority
Torridge
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
EX19 8HZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the requirements of BNG are relevant to the proposed development and, if so, whether such requirements are met

What decided it

The failure to meet the statutory biodiversity net gain requirements combined with the significant harm to character and appearance outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and the fallback position in the context of the tilted balance.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and failure to provide minimum information requirements for biodiversity net gain would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate benefits of housing delivery and the fallback Class Q scheme, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy ST04, Policy DM04, Policy DM08A, Policy ST14, Policy HCLW1, Policy ENV1, Policy ENV2

Judgments cited: Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823; Mansell v Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council [2017] EWCA Civ 1314

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.