Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 August 20266007559

Great Oaks, Snowerhill Road, Betchworth, RH3 7AQ

Planning appeal 6007559 at Great Oaks, Snowerhill Road, Betchworth, RH3 7AQ (Mole Valley District Council) was allowed on 3 August 2026 by Inspector C Housden, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect of the proposal on its openness, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies.

replacement vehicular and pedestrian access onto Snowerhill Road, drive and two outbuildings

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
C Housden
Postcode
RH3 7AQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including the effect of the proposal on its openness, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and relevant development plan policies
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The outbuildings are situated on previously developed land and do not cause substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt, and the driveway and replacement access are engineering operations that preserve openness, therefore the proposal is not inappropriate Green Belt development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN1Policy EN4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 143Paragraph 153Paragraph 154Paragraph 55

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mole Valley District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266013764
    Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266011465
    Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
  3. Dismissed16 September 20266008528
    Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
  4. Allowed11 September 20266012763
    Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
  5. Dismissed9 September 20266005433
    Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.