Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20266007726

Moon & Sixpence, 250 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End, HA5 4HS

Planning appeal 6007726 at Moon & Sixpence, 250 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End, HA5 4HS (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 31 July 2026 by Inspector Kate Williams, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby homes, with particular regard to noise and disturbance.

Variation of condition 1 (Opening Hours) attached to planning permission P/1657/16 to extend operating hours of public house to 00:30 Sunday to Wednesday and 01:30 Thursday to Saturday

Authority
London Borough of Harrow
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
leisure-sport
Inspector
Kate Williams
Postcode
HA5 4HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby homes, with particular regard to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The proposal has not clearly demonstrated that noise impacts from late-night customer dispersal would be satisfactorily mitigated and managed, particularly during sensitive night-time hours when nearby residents are resting or seeking sleep.

The modest economic and social benefits of increased flexibility for the operator and customer choice were outweighed by the harm to living conditions of nearby occupiers through noise and disturbance

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D13

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

241 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  2. Allowed5 October 20266011608
    6 Mead Close, Harrow Weald, Harrow, HA3 5JN
  3. Dismissed30 September 20266005822
    Former National Grid Site, Marsh Lane, Stanmore, HA7 2SN
  4. Allowed27 August 20266009442
    36 St Kildas Road, Harrow, HA1 1QA
  5. Dismissed15 July 20266005481
    3 Randon Close, Harrow, HA2 6NW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.