Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 July 20266007903

Porters Lodge, Ferndale Gardens, Royal Tunbridge Wells, TN2 3PL

Planning appeal 6007903 at Porters Lodge, Ferndale Gardens, Royal Tunbridge Wells, TN2 3PL (Tunbridge Wells) was dismissed on 10 July 2026 by Inspector L Gardner, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on trees and the setting of the adjacent conservation area.

demolition of existing garages and porters flat and construction of a pair of semi-detached dwellings

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
L Gardner
Postcode
TN2 3PL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on trees and the setting of the adjacent conservation area
  • whether the proposal would provide future occupiers with appropriate living conditions, with particular regard to natural light, outlook, and external amenity space
  • whether the proposal would provide adequate parking provision for future occupiers

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the area, including the likely future loss of protected trees and harm to the conservation area setting, combined with inadequate living conditions for future occupiers, outweighed the modest benefits of providing one additional dwelling.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EN1Policy EN12Policy EN4Policy TP3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 213Paragraph 212Paragraph 215Paragraph 125

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

48 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Tunbridge Wells

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed30 July 20266006922
    Larchmere House, Biddenden Road, Frittenden, Cranbrook, TN17 2EN
  2. Allowed19 December 20253366410
    Uphill, New Pond Road, Benenden, Cranbrook, Kent, TN17 4EJ
  3. Dismissed1 July 20253363683
    14 Prospect Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN2 4SQ
  4. Dismissed22 October 20243343315
    Former Agricultural Building, Land West of Brewer Street, Lamberhurst, Kent, TN3 8DY
  5. Allowed31 August 20233312834
    St Andrews Medical Centre, St Andrews Court, Pinewood Gardens, Southborough, Kent, TN4 0LZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.