Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 September 20266008555

36 Albany Crescent, Claygate, KT10 0PF

Planning appeal 6008555 at 36 Albany Crescent, Claygate, KT10 0PF (Elmbridge Borough Council) was dismissed on 17 September 2026 by Inspector Megan Thomas KC, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area.

Erection of a first floor flat extension with accommodation within the roof space

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Megan Thomas KC
Postcode
KT10 0PF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area
  • The effect on the living conditions of the occupants of 32 Albany Crescent with regard to outlook

What decided it

The substantial harms to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area, and to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, substantially outweigh the benefits of the proposal under NPPF policy S4.

The benefits of enhanced living accommodation for the existing family and future occupants are substantially outweighed by the harms to character, appearance and neighbour living conditions

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
CS17 of the Elmbridge Core Strategy 2011DM2 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015Elmbridge Design Code SPD
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy L2Policy S4

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

160 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Elmbridge Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266013396
    23 Avondale Avenue, Esher, KT10 0DB
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266013327
    69 Alexandra Road, Thames Ditton, KT7 0QS
  3. Dismissed16 October 20266008605
    Pavement Outside Tesco Stores Ltd, 108 - 118 Walton Road East Molesey, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266008598
    Pavement Outside Tesco Ltd, 108 – 118 Walton Road, East Molesey, KT8 0HP
  5. Allowed14 October 20266009254
    Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, KT10 9AD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.