Planning appeal decision
Thornhill Cottage, Ifield Road, Horley, rh60dl
Planning appeal 6008802 at Thornhill Cottage, Ifield Road, Horley, rh60dl (Mole Valley District Council) was dismissed on 15 July 2026 by Inspector G Sylvester, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework.
the erection of 1 No. detached dwelling following the demolition of the existing buildings
- Authority
- Mole Valley District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning
- Procedure
- Written
- Development
- residential
- Inspector
- G Sylvester
- Postcode
- RH6 0DL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to any relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework
- The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building known as Fullbrook Cottage
- If the proposal is inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The totality of harm to the Green Belt and the significance of the listed building was not clearly outweighed by other considerations, and no very special circumstances existed to justify the inappropriate development.
The modest cumulative weight of housing delivery, economic benefits and self-build provision was insufficient to outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and the less than substantial harm to the listed building's significance, which carried great weight against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN1Policy EN6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 110Paragraph 115Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 212Paragraph 215
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mole Valley District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026
- Dismissed20 October 20266013764Priory Lodge, River Lane, Leatherhead, KT22 0AU
- Dismissed19 October 20266011465Land to the South-East of Yarm Way, Leatherhead, KT22 8RQ
- Dismissed16 September 20266008528Henhurst Lodge, Beare Green Road, Beare Green, RH5 4PX
- Allowed11 September 20266012763Fourays, Horsham Road, Capel, Dorking, RH5 5LF
- Dismissed9 September 20266005433Land Opposite Manor House,, Headley, Headley Common, KT18 6NA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®