Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 August 20266008899

80 Wellington Road, Wealdstone, Harrow, HA3 5SE

Planning appeal 6008899 at 80 Wellington Road, Wealdstone, Harrow, HA3 5SE (London Borough of Harrow) was dismissed on 17 August 2026 by Inspector L Clark, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether there are suitable measures to manage flood risk.

single and two-storey side extension; rear dormer; one rooflight in front roof slope; external alterations

Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
L Clark
Postcode
HA3 5SE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether there are suitable measures to manage flood risk
  • the effect of the proposed two-storey extension and dormer on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area
  • whether the proposed two-storey side extension and dormer would provide adequate living conditions for existing occupants of 80 and 82 Cecil Road, with particular regard to outlook and sense of enclosure from within the outdoor amenity area

What decided it

The proposal failed to demonstrate adequate flood risk management and would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants and to the character and appearance of the area.

the private benefit of additional accommodation was outweighed by unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions, harm to character and appearance, and undemonstrated flood risk, resulting in dismissal as proportionate and in the public interest

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CN3Policy CN4Policy GR1Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021)Policy D3.D(7) of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 181

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

497 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Harrow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266006380
    Thrale Farm, 1 Oxhey Lane, Pinner, HA3 6SX
  2. Dismissed22 October 20266013962
    2 Whitefriars Avenue,, Harrow Weald, HA3 5RN
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266011336
    52 Durley Avenue, Pinner, HA5 1JH
  4. Dismissed16 October 20266011223
    30 Kenmore Avenue, Kenton, HA3 8PQ
  5. Dismissed16 October 20266008284
    24 Uxbridge Road, Stanmore, Harrow, HA7 3LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.