Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 July 20266009606

Land Between 124 and 142 Church Lane, Selston, NG16 6FD

Planning appeal 6009606 at Land Between 124 and 142 Church Lane, Selston, NG16 6FD (Ashfield) was dismissed on 30 July 2026 by Inspector Paul Thompson, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is suitable for residential development, with reference to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development, regarding the effect on the prevailing pattern of development and character and appearance of the area; and whether the proposal amounts to an efficient use of land.

Permission in Principle – Up to Five Dwellings

Authority
Ashfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Inspector
Paul Thompson
Postcode
NG16 6FD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is suitable for residential development, with reference to its location, the proposed land use and the amount of development, regarding the effect on the prevailing pattern of development and character and appearance of the area; and whether the proposal amounts to an efficient use of land

What decided it

The proposal's failure to respect the prevailing pattern of development and character of the area, combined with its inefficient use of land, outweighed the benefits of housing delivery in circumstances of a modest shortfall in supply.

the adverse impacts of granting permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the stated benefits, when assessed against the Framework's policies taken as a whole

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy ST1Policy ST4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 129

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

24 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266013738
    61 High Street, Hucknall, NG15 7AW
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266008160
    Land Between 191 and 234 Nottingham Road, Selston, Nottingham, NG16 6BT
  3. Dismissed7 September 20266011373
    202 Mansfield Road, Selston, NG16 6BB
  4. Quashed On Legal Grounds25 August 20263371810
    46 Mapplewells Road, Sutton-in-Ashfield, NG17 1HW
  5. Allowed25 August 20266011598
    1A Ellis Street, Kirkby In Ashfield, NG17 7AL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.