Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 July 20266010573

8 Wilfred Street, London, SW1E 6PL

the installation of guarding in association with use of roof as terrace

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder
Procedure
Written
Development
other
Postcode
SW1E 6PL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Birdcage Walk Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed railings would be clearly visible and out of character with the building's roofscape, disrupting the uniform rhythm of the roofline and causing less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area that outweighs the limited to moderate benefit of additional outdoor amenity space.

The limited to moderate benefit of additional outdoor amenity space to occupants' health and wellbeing did not outweigh the less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area, an irreplaceable resource requiring great weight in its conservation.

Framework references: 213, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy 42, Policy 44, Policy 45

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.