Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed8 October 20266011214

Basement To First Floor,, 58 - 60 Portland Street,, Manchester,, M1 4QT

Planning appeal 6011214 at Basement To First Floor,, 58 - 60 Portland Street,, Manchester,, M1 4QT (Manchester City Council) was allowed on 8 October 2026, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, including its effect upon the CA and nearby listed buildings.

change of use of ground floor from Class E to Sui Generis Adult Gaming Centre with installation of 2no. replacement air conditioning units and elevational alterations including new doors to Portland Street and Reyner Street

Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Hearing
Development
leisure-sport
Postcode
M1 4QT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and surrounding area, including its effect upon the CA and nearby listed buildings
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of nearby residential occupiers, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
  • the effect of the proposal on public safety in the area, with particular regard to crime and anti-social behaviour

What decided it

The Inspector found no harm arising from the proposal against any of the three main issues (heritage, residential noise, or public safety), so the proposal accorded with the development plan as a whole.

the Inspector found no adverse effects arising from the proposal when assessed against the Framework's national decision-making policies, so Policies S3 and S4 of the Framework indicated that the proposal should be approved

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM1Policy EN1Policy EN3Policy CC9Policy SP1Policy DC18Policy DC19Policy JP-Strat2Policy JP-P1Policy JP-P2Policy JP-P6Policy DC26Policy CC10Policy EN8
National Planning Policy Framework
Policy S3Policy S4Policy DP3Policy HE4Policy HE5Policy HE6Policy HE7Policy HE9Policy P3Policy P5
Judgments
Smith v First Secretary of State & Mid-Bedfordshire DC [2005] EWCA Civ 859

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

288 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Manchester City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266008018
    65 Grimshaw Lane, Manchester, M40 2AX
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266011458
    2B Minehead Avenue, Manchester, M20 1FW
  3. Dismissed27 August 20266008362
    16 Dalton Avenue, Manchester, M14 7NR
  4. Dismissed13 August 20266008786
    348 Droylsden Road, Manchester, M40 1GF
  5. Dismissed6 August 20266008662
    250-252 Bradford Road, Manchester, M40 7BT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.