Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 October 20266011770

5 Bull Ring, Worcester, WR2 5AA

Planning appeal 6011770 at 5 Bull Ring, Worcester, WR2 5AA (Worcester City Council) was dismissed on 20 October 2026, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St John's Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of the nearby listed buildings including 5 Bull Ring.

detached one-bedroom dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
WR2 5AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the St John's Conservation Area and the effect on the setting of the nearby listed buildings including 5 Bull Ring
  • The effect of the development on highway safety
  • whether the proposed development would result in an increased risk of flooding

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the St John's Conservation Area, which the Inspector found would not be outweighed by the modest housing benefit of a single dwelling, combined with unresolved highway safety concerns regarding parking and access.

the benefits of providing one dwelling would not outweigh the considerable weight attributed to the harm to the conservation area and the moderate weight attributed to highway safety harm; the benefits would be substantially outweighed by the adverse effects when assessed against the Framework's national decision-making policies

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SWDPR09SWDPR28SWDPR33SWDPR06SWDPR38SWDPR39
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 9

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

100 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Worcester City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Dismissed22 September 20266006644
    64, Prestwich Avenue, Worcester, WR5 1QF
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266011840
    56 Woodstock Road, Worcester, WR2 5NE
  3. Dismissed16 March 20266003017
    2 Dart Road, Worcester, WR5 1LF
  4. Dismissed19 January 20263374309
    49B Teme Road, Worcester, WR4 9AW
  5. Dismissed25 November 20253370937
    26-30 Malvern Road, St Johns, Worcester, WR2 4LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.